UPDATE: From The Desk Of Christopher Sawyer: About The Fire

You know, the Thomas Buck Hosiery Complex escaped my mind a few months ago. Yesterday at 6 in the morning, a roar of emails from friends whooshed into my inbox. I pulled up philly.com and whammo, the complex that I had helped investigate around Halloween on last year filled my computer screen. It was a huge sordid flambé of an abandoplex gone aflame.

No sooner than an hour after word got out that two of Philadelphia’s finest perished in the blaze, the City officials in absence of the mayor began their Denial-A-Thon.

“We did everything we could within the confines of the law.”
“We sent notices of violation to the property owner.”
“Insert bullshit statement here.”

You see, there is a massive, mostly known but as yet not oft-written industry in Philadelphia called “property squatting.” It works like this: You buy a parcel cheaply, hopefully close to where gentrification may one day come, and you sit on it. You don’t pay taxes, you don’t take care of L&I violations, you don’t have to bother with any of that shit. Property taxes? Unless you live in Chestnut Hill, the City will do nothing to collect on it.

The fines can continue to accrue and liens can be slapped on, but as a property squatter, you don’t really suffer any harm as long as you put the deed under a shell LLC. These are sunk costs.

Then you wait. And you wait. And sure enough, before you can say “vegan restaurant” and “doggie daycare,” another investor with an idea of a building in his head will come along, and offer you 1,000% more than what you originally paid for that lot. So when it comes time to go to settlement, part of the sale is used to clear off all the old liens and fines. When Michael and Yechiel Lichtenstein gave up on their idea for 80-some-odd apartments, they consciously decided to play the Property Squatting Game.

Is this anything new? Center City had a major property squatter, Sam Rappaport. One of his buildings killed a Philadelphia Municipal Court judge when a garage wall gave way.

You see, us neighbors in Fishtown and Kensington were a bit naive. We figured if we carpet-bombed 311, L&I may seal the factory to keep the junkies out, or they would exert enough pressure to get the owners to do it. When some of our tickets were getting closed by L&I as “UNFOUNDED,” I placed a personal request with a City Council staffer to tip the factory into Sheriff’s Sale. After a couple days and a few emails, the Law Department started that paperwork.

What’s the moral of this story? All the “court action” you hear L&I talking about? It’s bunk. Even if you don’t show up for court and a property squatter gets a judgement, nothing happens after that. Not a thing. If you’re unlucky to live next to an abandominium or an abandoplex, I don’t know what to say.

Some say the fire was started by junkies, other suggest it may have been an insurance fire. It really doesn’t matter how it started, the only thing that matters is: the City had at least 5 months to do something about it. And it didn’t. And now two of our Bravest are dead.

And it won’t matter how long the City runs the Denial-A-Thon, it won’t bring them back.

– Christopher Sawyer

Christopher Sawyer is a frothing at the mouth neighborhood activist in East Kensington.

UPDATE: This post was edited to remove the mention of “Jewish Lightning,” a slang term for an insurance fire. Though we often say things that are a bit off-color, it is never our intent to personally offend anyone.

  • thegreengrass

    Hidden City has really done an amazing job about detailing this building and the subsequent fire. While I can understand that the city has a procedure in place, it seems to be the least effective it could be. The fact that you can sit on a property, owe $60,000 in back taxes (not to mention $260,000 they owe for 728 Market, which they also own and are sitting on) and get away with it is mind-numbingly obscene.

    Do we have to have some kind of separate court just for real estate issues? One day a week that we sit down and keep the ball rolling against people who do this shit to the city? What the hell can we do?

  • arcticsplasher

    This is the third of those beautiful factory buildings near the York-Dauphin El station to burn in two years. Reusing even one of them adds a few hundred new residents to a neighborhood who then support retail, transit, etc – which is exactly why every other city with great industrial infrastructure like this works hard to make that happen. Here, the buildings sit rotting under speculators until they burn, and instead we get a row of suburban townhouses with two-car garages up front and vinyl bays over the sidewalks. Ridiculous.

  • C’mon Guys…

    It is devastating and horrid that two heroes gave their life for people who are cheating the system by sitting on property to make money. The city should go after the owners, without question. Before the fire, they were cheating the city by not paying taxes and leaving a blight on one of our neighborhoods.  Now they have blood on their hands.

    But can you please just call it arson for the sake of the insurance money rather than the antisemitic term you chose to use instead? 

  • Jewish Reader

    Sorry, can’t “pardon the term.” You debased an otherwise good article by using it.

  • Dan

    Oh, guys, you didn’t listen.  Sure, he might be throwing around antisemitism.  But, be fair, he said that you WILL pardon the term.  It wasn’t a request.  Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.

  • Narbitman

    You should be ashamed of yourself for exhibiting such blatant anti-semitism. You are clearly a talented journalist but this will certainly tarnish your reputation. Just despicable! Can your readers expect an apology?

  • DC

    A clever, clear, righteously angry piece that I was about to share with more than one knowledgeable and sympathetic urban-affairs expert.

    And then you had to go reference a Jew-bating slur. It fatally undermines your credibility and the credibility of the things you write. Don’t ass out like that.

  • C’mon Guys…

    The parenthetical “request” was added after the article was first published. That was not there yesterday. And it doesn’t make it less antisemetic. It makes it – in fact – more insulting. No I will not pardon it. 

  • http://twitter.com/realsteveeboy steveeboy

    a more nuanced discussion of the issues raised by this post here:  http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-12-08/news/religious-slumlord

  • PSM

    When the author of this piece diverts attention away from the core issue of  “property squatting” by dragging in antisemitic canards, he insults the memory of two brave men who risked their lives for all Philadelphians.

    Apology not accepted.

  • C’mon Guys…

    Thank you for the update and edit. It is much appreciated.

  • FD

    Once again, people forget about what the issue is and instead focus on being politically correct. Anti-semitic? Who cares! Get over it! A Lieutenant and a Firefighter were killed because of stupid, lazy, money driven people. It’s as simple as that. My Jewish friends, two of which are fellow firefighters, could care less about that term. Grow up and quit whining.

  • Guest

    It wasn’t “a bit off color”, it was anti-semitic, period. He’s made a point of emphasizing the ethnicity of the owners. See philadelphiaspeaks.com’s thread on 728 Market Street. 

    Sawyer’s work was good but he’s become a demagogue unable to accept any criticism, even offered in a constructive vein. 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/HNT6SYNGSYFGROJH72S3N4G6W4 T.

    Is ‘Jewish Lightning’ a specifically anti-semitic term?  It refers to the practice of burning down ones property for insurance monies or other benefits.   It’s often thrown around at Italians, WASPS, and other prevalent ethnicities in the development community that like to burn down their buildings.  Is there a suggestion that the simple colloquialism of ‘Jewish’ does something to impinge the reputation of all Jews?  That’s absurd and flatly contradicts the intention and use of the word.  Is saying “Jewish pickle” anti-semitic?  ”Jewish Apple Cake” pro-semitic because they are so delicious?

    This is a true semantic question, I’ve never viewed the term in as an anti-Semitic one.  It’s born out of the cultural separation between two property-owning ethnicities and doesn’t refer specifically to Jewish people in its usage, so why is wholesale use of the term deemed anti-semitic?  Because, uh, the owners of Buck Hoisery (and now Front + Girard) were ultra-Orthodox Jews?  And because they burned down their building for insurance money?