<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Hot New Local Media Trend: Stories About How Mayyybe Philly.com Might Start Charging For Content</title> <atom:link href="http://www.philebrity.com/2009/06/02/hot-new-local-media-trend-stories-about-how-mayyybe-phillycom-might-start-charging-for-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2009/06/02/hot-new-local-media-trend-stories-about-how-mayyybe-phillycom-might-start-charging-for-content/</link> <description>philly&#039;s longest-standing cityblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Allan Smithee</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2009/06/02/hot-new-local-media-trend-stories-about-how-mayyybe-phillycom-might-start-charging-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11744</link> <dc:creator>Allan Smithee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:46:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=22767#comment-11744</guid> <description>re: Then again, how would that be different than a flat fee, anyway, right?I generally purchase Inky/Inky Jr. daily so I might be tempted to purchase a home delivery subscription to have unlimited access to Philly.com. It would actually save me money.I definitely would not pay a flat fee just for access to the website... I don&#039;t consider &quot;Attytood&quot; a must online read.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Then again, how would that be different than a flat fee, anyway, right?</p><p>I generally purchase Inky/Inky Jr. daily so I might be tempted to purchase a home delivery subscription to have unlimited access to Philly.com. It would actually save me money.</p><p>I definitely would not pay a flat fee just for access to the website&#8230; I don&#8217;t consider &#8220;Attytood&#8221; a must online read.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Larry</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2009/06/02/hot-new-local-media-trend-stories-about-how-mayyybe-phillycom-might-start-charging-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11741</link> <dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:36:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=22767#comment-11741</guid> <description>I like the idea of posting excerpts on their site and paying for the rest, but &quot;home delivery&quot;? I doubt a lot of people would be willing to do that. Then again, how would that be different than a flat fee, anyway, right?Cool concept, though!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of posting excerpts on their site and paying for the rest, but &#8220;home delivery&#8221;? I doubt a lot of people would be willing to do that. Then again, how would that be different than a flat fee, anyway, right?</p><p>Cool concept, though!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Allan Smithee</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2009/06/02/hot-new-local-media-trend-stories-about-how-mayyybe-phillycom-might-start-charging-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11738</link> <dc:creator>Allan Smithee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:02:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=22767#comment-11738</guid> <description>If Philly.com wants to make money from it&#039;s content, they should do what The New Yorker does, albeit the money made is the &quot;old fashioned way.&quot;Just post excerpts of the majority of stories and only persons that have a home delivery subscription can access all content in an unlimited way.Yes, I know, Inky/Inky Jr. (aka Daily News) are not the New Yorker but that&#039;s a way that seems sorta &quot;fair and honest&quot; if you believe free content is theft.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Philly.com wants to make money from it&#8217;s content, they should do what The New Yorker does, albeit the money made is the &#8220;old fashioned way.&#8221;</p><p>Just post excerpts of the majority of stories and only persons that have a home delivery subscription can access all content in an unlimited way.</p><p>Yes, I know, Inky/Inky Jr. (aka Daily News) are not the New Yorker but that&#8217;s a way that seems sorta &#8220;fair and honest&#8221; if you believe free content is theft.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Larry</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2009/06/02/hot-new-local-media-trend-stories-about-how-mayyybe-phillycom-might-start-charging-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11734</link> <dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:35:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=22767#comment-11734</guid> <description>Didn&#039;t you reference Philly.com recently for the story about The Bulletin? Doesn&#039;t that break the boycott you have?At any rate, charging for content is fine with me. If its gotten to the point where people are OK with paying for content again and its a viable model, then I think it would be a good way to find out just how viable it is down the line.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t you reference Philly.com recently for the story about The Bulletin? Doesn&#8217;t that break the boycott you have?</p><p>At any rate, charging for content is fine with me. If its gotten to the point where people are OK with paying for content again and its a viable model, then I think it would be a good way to find out just how viable it is down the line.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rewritefullwise</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2009/06/02/hot-new-local-media-trend-stories-about-how-mayyybe-phillycom-might-start-charging-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11710</link> <dc:creator>rewritefullwise</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:12:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=22767#comment-11710</guid> <description>Also, pay-walls don&#039;t work: http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-read-the-wsj-for-free-online-2009-6</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, pay-walls don&#8217;t work: <a
href="http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-read-the-wsj-for-free-online-2009-6" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-read-the-wsj-for-free-online-2009-6</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alexm</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2009/06/02/hot-new-local-media-trend-stories-about-how-mayyybe-phillycom-might-start-charging-for-content/comment-page-1/#comment-11704</link> <dc:creator>alexm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:56:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=22767#comment-11704</guid> <description>they can&#039;t get RSS feeds right, how on earth are they going  get a subscription service functioning? if they made the decision right now, it&#039;d probably take a year for them to launch an unusable beta.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they can&#8217;t get RSS feeds right, how on earth are they going  get a subscription service functioning? if they made the decision right now, it&#8217;d probably take a year for them to launch an unusable beta.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 336/340 objects using apc

Served from: www.philebrity.com @ 2012-02-12 16:21:56 -->
