True Tales Of Intern Horrors: Inside The Culture Of Anger And Entitlement At Phila. Newspapers, Inc.

inquirer-building

“You want to step outside and talk about this?,” said one of the other reporters at my desk. I thought that my career was over, that no one would ever want to hire me because I was the intern that got into a fistfight with a reporter twice his age. I tried to diffuse the situation.
“Listen man,” I said, “Why don’t I buy you a beer after work and we’ll talk about the paper. I don’t think what I said was mean spirited, I want this paper to be good.”
He didn’t care. “Fuck you,” he kept saying. “Let’s go outside, pussy.” He was really saying this stuff, over a blog comment. It was like a bad dream.
OK, talking wasn’t going to work. I decided to just turn back to my computer and hope that he quits. No dice.
“Go back to your blogs while we pay you, you fucker,” he said.

Everybody knows that interns get the short end of the stick; that’s why they’re interns. But after the jump, one reader tells a hair-raising tale of anger, resentment and frustration in the hallowed halls of the city’s (at least for now) two biggest daily newspapers. As Chapter 11 proceedings move on for the Inquirer and Daily News, it’s a story worth telling: Though the rank and file like to say otherwise, the rot at Broad & Whatever wasn’t entirely from the top down — unfortunately, it came from all over.

I was a journalism major taking 18 credits while working a full time job during the fall semester of my senior year. I already had a bunch of internships under my belt and was developing a nice sideline in freelance writing (I didn’t sleep much during college), but the Inquirer was a place I absolutely had to work at. I grew up reading the paper — still read it daily at that point — and it was my dream at the time to be a reporter there. So when they opened the place up for internships (apparently this was the first non-summer internship program they ever hosted) and I was selected, I was ecstatic. I shifted my work schedule to fit the internship in, and worked it out with my college that I would be receiving credit for an independent study since I had already maxed out internship credits. Everything was awesome.

My first couple of weeks there were great. I met a few writers I had come to admire over the years, and went on assignments cooler than anything I had ever done before. In my first four or five days there I had collected (I think) three bylines, albeit on stories that were of little importance. But my writing was in section A of the frickin’ Inquirer, on page two even. My life was incredible.

Then, during my second full week there, the editor in charge of the desk pulled me aside. He had a morose-as-hell look on his face, and he said to me, “You’re going to have to lay back a while, we just had a shitstorm handed down to us from on high.” He said things were going to get bad around there, and boy, did they. The shitstorm ended up being the first big round of buyouts and layoffs — the ones that, in my mind at least, mark the beginning of the third act in the Inquirer’s tragedy.

The tone of the newsroom was night and day. People were angry, huddling in corners and gossiping. The paranoia was palpable, everyone was freaking out: What if not enough people take the buyouts? Who is going to get laid off? A photo intern I spoke with fairly regularly said he had all his assignments taken from him and was forced to basically sit and stare at the wall all day; in his eyes, the photo desk, attempting to prevent any layoffs, was making its paid staff to act as busy as possible.

My desk took a similar approach with me. They ignored me, pretended like I didn’t exist. Initially, I pitched things or asked for stuff to do repeatedly. Once it became clear that I was annoying them — and that some outright resented my presence — I only approached once or twice daily. The editor did at one point throw me a bone. The catch was, he wanted me to work with another section editor — in other words he was passing me off to someone else.

So I talked with that section editor once or twice about what he wanted in the story. In what was maybe our second or third conversation, he essentially told me he wasn’t interested in helping me with any story at all, saying, “Fuck man, my days here are numbered, I’m thinking about taking this buyout and getting out of here.”

Great. So the people I’m supposed to be working with don’t want me around. The guy they shuffled me off to blows me off because he’s taking the buyout. It was clear that I wouldn’t be doing more reporting or getting more bylines. What the hell was I supposed to do? Well, I’ll tell you what I did: I went in there and read newspapers and blogs all day. They might have been too preoccupied with buyouts and contracts and paranoia to give me work to do, but I wasn’t against just showing up, fulfilling the bare minimum of my agreement and getting the line on my resume. What better choice did I have? Of course, I understood their position to an extent; they all had families to feed and bills to pay, their allegiance was to themselves, not to the kid who hoped to one day join their ranks. I chalked it up to bad timing more than anything else, but that doesn’t mean it was any less frustrating for me.

Then one day a few months in, I was reading one of the blogs the Inky & DN had at that point put up. The writer had written a post along the lines of, “How do we save the Inquirer and Daily News?” He invited people to comment about what was wrong with the paper, and what needed improving, and he wanted it from anyone and everyone, readers and staffers alike. I decided to leave a comment, the exact contents of what I don’t remember, but I do remember that it was constructive criticism along the lines of “Too much AP, the city desk needs more neighborhood-centric reporting, etc.” Stuff that three years on, the Inquirer seems to be trying to do but definitely wasn’t doing then and even an intern could see what was wrong.

Anyways, I apparently left something identifiable in the comment. I can’t remember what, but I probably just signed it with my full name. Dumb move by me, I admit. The next thing I know, one of the other reporters at my desk, the one directly behind me who had barely said a word to me during my several months there, is talking to me. And he’s not just talking to me, he’s talking bona fide shit.

“So you think this section sucks, huh? What the fuck do you know? You just show up here and get paid to look at blogs all day.”

Let me take this moment to say I wasn’t paid at the Inquirer, not even when they printed my work. I was there by choice, for free, everyday. No interns were paid ever, as far as I know. I was there because I wanted to learn, and because working at the Inquirer had been a dream of mine. But this guy assumed I was paid to be there, and suddenly the resentment made a little sense: It’s possible that they looked at me funny because they thought I was somehow taking their money.

I responded, “I’m not paid to be here,” but he didn’t care. He was turning red and angry. This guy was short and pudgy and at least twice my age. I, on the other hand, am a pretty big guy and I was young and in shape. This did not stop him from going to the ol’ fratboy standard:

“You want to step outside and talk about this?” He may have added some expletive in there, I’m not sure because there was a major freak out happening in my mind. I thought that my career was over, that no one would ever want to hire me because I was the intern that got into a fistfight with a reporter twice his age. I tried to diffuse the situation.

“Listen, man,” I said. “Why don’t I buy you a beer after work and we’ll talk about the paper. I don’t think what I said was mean spirited, I want this paper to be good.”

He didn’t care. “Fuck you,” he kept saying. “Let’s go outside, pussy.” He was really saying this stuff, over a blog comment. It was like a bad dream.

OK, talking wasn’t going to work. I decided to just turn back to my computer and hope that he quits. No dice.

“Go back to your blogs while we pay you, you fucker,” he said.

Let me add here that this was happening in a crowded newsroom. There were people all around, and I think it would be impossible for them not to notice their veteran reporter spewing expletives and challenging an intern to a fight. The fact that no one came over and tried to diffuse the situation, that this guy’s boss didn’t step in or that one of his buddies didn’t try to get one of us to walk away, speaks volumes to the attitude in the newsroom at the time. Either they put their heads in the sand in hope that the bad situation would blow over and no one would have to step out and do something, or they just resented the young ambitious intern so much that they enjoyed watching this guy try to fight me.

Eventually I just grabbed my stuff and left for the day, because this guy was not stopping. It took all I had in me not to accept his offer to “chat” outside.

Later, I contacted the author of the original blog post about removing the comment, but he politely refused, which was the right call on his part as far as blog ethics go (I think… do blog ethics truly exist?). Then I got a phone call from the editor, my supervisor. He basically said it would have been wise for me not to comment on the blog at all (I agreed) but that I didn’t do anything wrong, and that the reporter who wanted to fight me was entirely out of line. He suggested that maybe I take the next day off and my desk would be moved.

Turns out, that was a fucking lie. My school informed me that my internship was cancelled and I had to have a meeting with the internship coordinator. My school had thrown me under the bus and was blaming me for upsetting this guy to the point that he would verbally attack and challenge me to a fight. Apparently, I was in big trouble and blah blah blah, whatever; I was just pissed off that they would side with an imploding corporate entity with angry staff that threatens their students rather than me, who was paying tuition. Worst of all, my academic adviser never filed my paperwork for the independent study, and so I didn’t get any credit at all. Fuck.

Several years and several jobs later, I am out of print media. Though I do occasionally freelance, any dreams I had of a lifelong career as a reporter are over. Sure, the downfall of the industry has a lot to do with that, but I would be lying if I didn’t say my experience at the Inquirer didn’t disillusion me just a little bit. I can’t say that the reporter challenging me to a fight was the big reason for disillusionment, but it does serve as a handy symbol for all the culminating elements at the Inquirer. And with all this said, let me conclude by saying I still want the Inquirer to be good, to recapture its Pulitzer-winning days. It’s still the paper that made me fall in love with journalism. I want the best for it. I hope they find a way to save it and the Daily News through all this bankruptcy stuff. So, good luck with that.

– Anonymous

17 Responses to “True Tales Of Intern Horrors: Inside The Culture Of Anger And Entitlement At Phila. Newspapers, Inc.”

  1. buddy Says:

    great story. bad grammar.

  2. Hovering Says:

    So who was the reporter? It ain’t libel if it’s true — especially with witnesses and a corroborating editor boss. Can we at least know the section?

    (Philebrity eds: You guys vouch here? If so, good enough for me.)

  3. tips Says:

    We wouldn’t have run it if we couldn’t vouch for the author’s veracity. Totally happened.

  4. Hovering Says:

    Good; ’twas my inclination. It’s just so over the top, even for smug Inky types. What’s worse is they used to be much more so, collectively. Smug, that is. “Destination newspaper” and all that. Thousand-yard stares for the Gene Roberts era, which soon will be two decades ago.

  5. bellavistababe Says:

    I got all concerned about this intern — until I saw that it happened YEARS ago. If it was during the first round of buy-outs, that means it was over two years ago, and this guy is still riled about it?
    Was it wrong for the reporter – who was likely just told he was losing his job – to take it out on the intern? Yes.
    But come on. People yell in newsrooms. Does it happen every day? No. But often enough that no one really notices.
    Maybe the media just isn’t the place for you.. and that’s OK.

  6. John Lightstone Says:

    @bellavistababe — he didn’t just yell, he (or the paper, not clear) made sure that the intern lost his/her internship and got in trouble with his/her school. That’s a great way to foster young reporters and new blood in the industry!

  7. RockyPhilly Says:

    I worked at the Inquirer at the time of this alleged incident. It’s definitely something the newsroom would have buzzed about — yet this is the first I’ve heard of it.

    tips may have vouched that the writer worked at the Inky and lost an internship there, but did tips double check with the alleged aggressor or others in the story?

    Frankly, it sounds ridiculous. Even the premises is questionable: Something the innocent intern put in the evil blog post somehow identified him to the reporters he admits had little interest in him? What did he put down, his social security number?

    And the Inquirer doesn’t generally run local stories in the A section on page 2, so unless the intern was doing some international reporting, it’s unlucky his work appeared there.

  8. ob Says:

    Is this the difference between blogging and journalism? I believe Dan Gross would have at least called the Inquirer for a comment before printing such gossip.

  9. Hovering Says:

    RockPhilly has good points, and come to think of it, I would’ve heard about it as well.

    tips, I’d love it if you could explain further. No’ffense’justsayin

  10. tips Says:

    Guys – Loving the whole tone in some of these comments that’s like “I work(ed) at the inky, and if I didn’t hear about it, IT COULDN’T HAVE HAPPENED!” Please. Fact is, we swore to keep the author anonymous — for simple reasons of Googlability/job-hunting down the road — but we stand by his story 100%.

  11. Chris Brennan Says:

    According to the Tippy Philocrisy handy handbook of journalism standards and ethics, only Tippy Philocrisy sets the standards and only Tippy Philocrisy can exempt himself from the ethics.
    And I quote:
    “Keep in mind here that a DN reporter and a blogger are not held to the same bar, and thank God for that.” Tips, 2/26/09
    http://www.philebrity.com/2009/02/26/dan-gross-will-have-none-of-your-merrymaking-oh-pardon-me-i-have-a-piece-about-lindsay-lohans-dad-to-finish-up/#comment-9495

  12. tips Says:

    Chris Brennan, ever the Company Man. Sad.

  13. Chris Brennan Says:

    Tippy, I wonder this: When you defend Philebrity, are you a Blog Man? And do you consider that sad? Or is that part of your larger “Do as I say, not as I blog” policy?

  14. tips Says:

    Brennan, isn’t there an intern somewhere around the offices at Broad & Whatever that you can browbeat to make up for the fucking miserable Neil LaBute play that must be your life right now? You know, instead of commenting here.

  15. Chris Brennan Says:

    Nothing irritates Tippy’s thin skin more than clearly defined examples of his hypocrisy.

  16. tips Says:

    Look at this fucker go! You on company time, brah?

  17. Hovering Says:

    I have to say, I’m hovering toward Brennan, whoever he is. Philebrity doth protest too much, or something.

    I have no love for the PI, the DN, PNI or PMH, etc. etc. But the original story above, with a full illustration of the building, smacks of a lie, or a very embellished tale at the least. It looks like someone trying to be a journalist who is writing to say that he was fucked out of being a journalist by some, you know, really hard-assed journalist who called him a dick for writing stupid shit under his real name.

    Nobody at a newspaper, with the very outside possibility of Buzz Bissinger or Dexter, would ever say, “Let’s take it outside.” And even Bissinger would not have said it until he earned it.

    That you vouch means something to me, but the more I think about it, I’m sort of, …. yeah… no. Let me explain.

    I’m here because you have yourselves a great site, with 1. breaking news, 2. outstanding snark and 3. some great dirt, NNITO. But unless it is somebody whose name you are using and who really deserves it, you know, like Weiner (I’m told someone asked how it was she was hired directly to the Inky, straight out of Harvard, with no experience except for … Harvard, and that she had a lawsuit-threatening shit-fit [see what I mean? Might be true, might not be ... but I believe the source] …)
    OK; lost my train of thought, as I share a certain rage with Philebrity. Witness compromised.

    But; bottom line: I don’t believe your boy.
    Forget about Brennan and whatever feud you have there. Because what you have here is a brilliant opportunity to say what a blog is, what it isn’t… You have…
    Well, you have a nice opportunity. Think about it. Out me if you want; I’m sure that’s possible. But really, in all seriousness, what is this place?

    There’s no “tone.” There’s no doubt at all that it could very well have happened. But also please don’t put words in my mouth and say that I said, “It couldn’t have happened.” I’m here to say, and in fact said: Yeah, primadonna reporter, feeling his privileged oats, getting a hard-on for an intern? Natch.

    Don’t say, “Please.” That’s kind of rude. I’m trying to understand and trying to help. Yeah, I know, with that kind of help…

    It’s a credibility thing.
    I believe that you believe the writer of the tale. I just don’t believe him. It’s not that I know better than you.

    It’s just that I don’t buy it, and now I’m little soured on a site I was sweet on.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.