<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Well, We Wanted To Highlight Our Favorite &#8220;End Of The Year&#8221; Lists, But We Got Burnt Out About Ten Minutes Into It</title> <atom:link href="http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/</link> <description>philly&#039;s longest-standing cityblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: in a cave</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8349</link> <dc:creator>in a cave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:16:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=17945#comment-8349</guid> <description>I will say that I listened to M83&#039;s &quot;Saturdays = Youth&quot; more than any record in a very long time. It would be my #1 - other than that record, P-fork&#039;s list is total miss for me. Usually the top 10 have been so overplayed and hyped that I don&#039;t give a rat&#039;s ass by the time the list comes out. Fleet Foxes certainly falls into that category for me. They may be good, but by the time 2009 gets here, I&#039;d rather not hear another one of their songs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say that I listened to M83&#8242;s &#8220;Saturdays = Youth&#8221; more than any record in a very long time. It would be my #1 &#8211; other than that record, P-fork&#8217;s list is total miss for me. Usually the top 10 have been so overplayed and hyped that I don&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s ass by the time the list comes out. Fleet Foxes certainly falls into that category for me. They may be good, but by the time 2009 gets here, I&#8217;d rather not hear another one of their songs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Lightstone</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8320</link> <dc:creator>John Lightstone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:13:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=17945#comment-8320</guid> <description>Onion AV Club tends to have a good end of year writeup.  Actually, overall, it has some of the better music reviews on the net.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Onion AV Club tends to have a good end of year writeup.  Actually, overall, it has some of the better music reviews on the net.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lord_whimsy</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8318</link> <dc:creator>lord_whimsy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:55:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=17945#comment-8318</guid> <description>People still make &lt;i&gt;rock&lt;/i&gt; albums? How quaint.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People still make <i>rock</i> albums? How quaint.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anna</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8316</link> <dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:32:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=17945#comment-8316</guid> <description>The only fun thing about working at Paper was that my desk was right next to, what I called, the crummy bin; where all the promo swag was tossed for the lesser staff members to sort through.I scored a constant stream of top-of-the-line-cosmetics, even though usually the shades were a bit mismatched for my skin tone. Whatevs! It was freeee!I was part of the impoverished elite: making less than $24,000 a year, living paycheck to paycheck, having zero dollars in savings, but wearing $120 moisturizer and $60 lipstick. Kinda ridic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only fun thing about working at Paper was that my desk was right next to, what I called, the crummy bin; where all the promo swag was tossed for the lesser staff members to sort through.</p><p>I scored a constant stream of top-of-the-line-cosmetics, even though usually the shades were a bit mismatched for my skin tone. Whatevs! It was freeee!</p><p>I was part of the impoverished elite: making less than $24,000 a year, living paycheck to paycheck, having zero dollars in savings, but wearing $120 moisturizer and $60 lipstick. Kinda ridic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sugar Town</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8315</link> <dc:creator>Sugar Town</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:22:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=17945#comment-8315</guid> <description>Paper Mag seems like a fun place to work. Or at least their party pics seem fun.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paper Mag seems like a fun place to work. Or at least their party pics seem fun.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anna</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8314</link> <dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:58:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=17945#comment-8314</guid> <description>Hey Sara!I mainly wrote for a rag called Mean Street, which is based out of LA. I also wrote for a handful of zines. I also did freelance for Heckler, Thrasher, and Philly&#039;s own Rockpile. Additionally, I wrote for Paper magazine, as I also worked there right after undergrad. There&#039;s probably a few more places that I&#039;m forgetting!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sara!</p><p>I mainly wrote for a rag called Mean Street, which is based out of LA. I also wrote for a handful of zines. I also did freelance for Heckler, Thrasher, and Philly&#8217;s own Rockpile. Additionally, I wrote for Paper magazine, as I also worked there right after undergrad. There&#8217;s probably a few more places that I&#8217;m forgetting!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tsarstruck</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8313</link> <dc:creator>tsarstruck</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=17945#comment-8313</guid> <description>It&#039;s probably good to keep in mind that Pitchfork&#039;s list is done via some sort of voting system amongst their contributors.  Unclear if there&#039;s any editorial tampering.I&#039;ll admit to thinking that Beck&#039;s latest actually was pretty good and that Dangermouse had a lot to do with that.  Though I&#039;ll agree that both Guero and The Information were nothing short of unlistenable.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably good to keep in mind that Pitchfork&#8217;s list is done via some sort of voting system amongst their contributors.  Unclear if there&#8217;s any editorial tampering.</p><p>I&#8217;ll admit to thinking that Beck&#8217;s latest actually was pretty good and that Dangermouse had a lot to do with that.  Though I&#8217;ll agree that both Guero and The Information were nothing short of unlistenable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sugar Town</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8312</link> <dc:creator>Sugar Town</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:43:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=17945#comment-8312</guid> <description>I think there are people who just vote for Beck, no matter what he does, year after year. I am like that with Holly Golightly, but most lists don&#039;t reflect that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are people who just vote for Beck, no matter what he does, year after year. I am like that with Holly Golightly, but most lists don&#8217;t reflect that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anna</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8311</link> <dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:42:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=17945#comment-8311</guid> <description>RIL, I&#039;m totally with you on that one. After reading Spin&#039;s, Blender&#039;s, Rolling Stone&#039;s, and Pitchfork&#039;s top lists, I&#039;m happy to just go back to listening to my dorky mallpunk. I just cannot concede that some of the records tha they picked were the best.Oh, and any list that mentions any new-school Beck as a top album immediately disqualifies their opinion in my book. Is that crazy?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIL, I&#8217;m totally with you on that one. After reading Spin&#8217;s, Blender&#8217;s, Rolling Stone&#8217;s, and Pitchfork&#8217;s top lists, I&#8217;m happy to just go back to listening to my dorky mallpunk. I just cannot concede that some of the records tha they picked were the best.</p><p>Oh, and any list that mentions any new-school Beck as a top album immediately disqualifies their opinion in my book. Is that crazy?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sugar Town</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/12/23/well-we-wanted-to-highlight-our-top-ten-end-of-the-year-list-lists-but-we-got-burnt-out-after-about-ten-minutes-into-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8310</link> <dc:creator>Sugar Town</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:41:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=17945#comment-8310</guid> <description>One of my least favorite tasks (among many) as a rock critic is/was the dreaded end-of-the year list. Numbers can&#039;t capture my passion, and I live in the moment with music. I can barely remember what I listened to this morning much less last January. This year, I ended up list-less and it was oddly freeing. Anna, who did you write for?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my least favorite tasks (among many) as a rock critic is/was the dreaded end-of-the year list. Numbers can&#8217;t capture my passion, and I live in the moment with music. I can barely remember what I listened to this morning much less last January. This year, I ended up list-less and it was oddly freeing. Anna, who did you write for?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/14 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 408/412 objects using apc

Served from: www.philebrity.com @ 2012-02-12 16:41:29 -->
