13 Responses to “Readers Photoshop: At Long Last, The Mighty Face Of… Bizarro Nutter!”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
13 Responses to “Readers Photoshop: At Long Last, The Mighty Face Of… Bizarro Nutter!”Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment. |
December 3rd, 2008 at 6:38 pm
Yeah yeah, Nutter planned big cuts all along and he was lying to you when he campaigned about how much he was looking out for the best interest of the city. Let it go…
The “cool kids” in Philly are mad because their beloved Fishtown lost a library, a pool, AND a firetruck while most other places just lost 1 thing. Sucks, eh? Ever think that maybe 1. your hood was over-represented by those things according to planning stats used for cities nationwide or 2. City Hall thinks you’ll be just fine without them, probably by showing some damn initiative and creating community-run programs to cover gaps in learning and recreation?
December 3rd, 2008 at 6:55 pm
HaHa CityMaps Sux!
This response posted from the Fishtown branch of the Free Library of Philadelphia.
Long Live the Free Library System!
December 3rd, 2008 at 8:03 pm
It would be nice if all the people angry about the cuts the city is going to have to make actually heard sustainability director Mark Allen Hughes eloquent and sobering opinion on the matter a while back at JB’s.
Just sayin’.
December 3rd, 2008 at 8:31 pm
amen to that, Patricio. thanks for the sanity check.
December 3rd, 2008 at 9:22 pm
Looks a little like MF Doom.
December 3rd, 2008 at 11:45 pm
please. fishtown..cool? LoL. what is this like the 5th spot in the city that is classified as “cool” in the past what 8 years since, living in the city was relevant to that.
December 4th, 2008 at 12:05 pm
I can’t stop looking at this
December 4th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Wouldn’t Bizarro Nutter be . . . . John Street?
December 4th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
@ John Lightstone:
Yeah, but then I wouldn’t get to play with Photoshop.
December 4th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
re: “It would be nice if all the people angry about the cuts the city is going to have to make actually heard sustainability director Mark Allen Hughes eloquent and sobering opinion on the matter a while back at JB’s.”
Hmmm, wonder if he has any influence in the Nutter Administration about what firms the city uses for financial planning and/or investments. I’m sure both ING & Barnes Noble would be up to being the new corp. public library branch for the Rittenhouse Sq. area.
Or is that branch sustainable and not needing synergy?
December 4th, 2008 at 2:24 pm
@jeffreybleachedblack: but you can’t possibly photoshop anything better than this photo. You just can’t.
http://www.philebrity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/mayorstreet.jpg
December 4th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
1. Yes, the photo is quite awesome
2. Fishtown is not “cool” and neither is any city hood more so than another. Mmy point was that it is recently heavy with activists who feel slighted by Nutter after supporting him for election.
3. I’m also saying we shouldn’t think Nutter is duplicitous just because we may not agree with a tough decision that had to be made. Hey library closings make a nasty soundbyte, but compare to the burbs:
Cherry Hill has ONE public library for 71,000 people
Philadelphia AFTER cuts will have 43 for 1,450,000 people
So, either Philadelphia will STILL have more than twice as many libraries per person as some so-called affluent towns who seem to be doing quite well at cranking out productive members of society…OR Cherry Hill has 1/3rd as many as some people would say they need, and I don’t see their kids running wild in the streets from boredom.
Don’t talk size of library branches either, because a book at one can be ordered from another.
Some of the decision to close libraries came from numbers like these, showing that we can do without a few of them.
December 4th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
re: “I’m also saying we shouldn’t think Nutter is duplicitous just because we may not agree with a tough decision that had to be made.”
Nutter fucked up. He and Council decided things behind closed doors without involving the public in the process or in plain view of the press.