http://www.philebrity.com/2008/10/09/readers-fwd-washington-square-hos-will-steal-the-money-right-out-of-your-couch/ philly's longest-standing cityblog Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:04:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.philebrity.com/2008/10/09/readers-fwd-washington-square-hos-will-steal-the-money-right-out-of-your-couch/comment-page-1/#comment-6933 tips Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:03:34 +0000 http://www.philebrity.com/?p=15723#comment-6933 While we are always vigilant about apostrophe overuse, it is our feeling that "ho's" is appropriate Philebrity style. Ho's. While we are always vigilant about apostrophe overuse, it is our feeling that “ho’s” is appropriate Philebrity style. Ho’s.

]]> http://www.philebrity.com/2008/10/09/readers-fwd-washington-square-hos-will-steal-the-money-right-out-of-your-couch/comment-page-1/#comment-6931 killabee Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:54:59 +0000 http://www.philebrity.com/?p=15723#comment-6931 hey what's the philebrity style sheet say about gratituous apostrophe use? even the NYT, home of apostrophe overuse, doesn't use one for derived forms like hos (if you're worried you can make it hoes, which is clearer, or since it's just a truncated r-deleting form of "whore", just use that). hey what’s the philebrity style sheet say about gratituous apostrophe use? even the NYT, home of apostrophe overuse, doesn’t use one for derived forms like hos (if you’re worried you can make it hoes, which is clearer, or since it’s just a truncated r-deleting form of “whore”, just use that).

]]>