<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Uncyclopedia: WTF???</title> <atom:link href="http://www.philebrity.com/2008/09/24/uncyclopedia-wtf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/09/24/uncyclopedia-wtf/</link> <description>You're famous. (For Philly.)</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:05:13 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Boomsta</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/09/24/uncyclopedia-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-6652</link> <dc:creator>Boomsta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:56:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=15172#comment-6652</guid> <description>Apologies, it appears I don&#039;t quite know how to format comments here. The plain links that I posted are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia#Criticism and http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/☃</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies, it appears I don&#8217;t quite know how to format comments here. The plain links that I posted are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia#Criticism" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia#Criticism</a> and <a href="http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/☃" rel="nofollow">http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/☃</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Boomsta</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/09/24/uncyclopedia-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-6651</link> <dc:creator>Boomsta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:50:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=15172#comment-6651</guid> <description>Hey, I&#039;m from Uncyclopedia, and I&#039;m quite frankly amazed at this article. I believe that this is the first outside source I&#039;ve seen that&#039;s managed to mention how offensive some articles are without interpreting it as the collective will of Uncyclopedians (that&#039;s what we call ourselves. Nifty.) that [insert subject here] be damned. Seriously, check out our article on Wikipedia, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia#Criticism&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. I applaud you. Anyway, thanks for the mention, and if you want to see the real quality of Uncyclopedia try the &quot;Featured content&quot; link in the navigation sidebar. Or go &lt;a&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m from Uncyclopedia, and I&#8217;m quite frankly amazed at this article. I believe that this is the first outside source I&#8217;ve seen that&#8217;s managed to mention how offensive some articles are without interpreting it as the collective will of Uncyclopedians (that&#8217;s what we call ourselves. Nifty.) that [insert subject here] be damned. Seriously, check out our article on Wikipedia, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia#Criticism" rel="nofollow"></a>. I applaud you. Anyway, thanks for the mention, and if you want to see the real quality of Uncyclopedia try the &#8220;Featured content&#8221; link in the navigation sidebar. Or go <a>here</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: julie.t</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/09/24/uncyclopedia-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-6646</link> <dc:creator>julie.t</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:42:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=15172#comment-6646</guid> <description>humor is always, ALWAYS killed dead by misspelling. &quot;Alleghany&quot;? automatic disqualification, even if the entry were funny in the first place, which it wasn&#039;t.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>humor is always, ALWAYS killed dead by misspelling. &#8220;Alleghany&#8221;? automatic disqualification, even if the entry were funny in the first place, which it wasn&#8217;t.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Grapesoda</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/09/24/uncyclopedia-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-6640</link> <dc:creator>Grapesoda</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=15172#comment-6640</guid> <description>Well, it&#039;s funny cos it&#039;s true. Especially trashtown. What&#039;s odd is that there is no entry on a city like austin tx. Surely that place can be ripped to shreds. Yet, there is a rather extensive including no less, separate articles on the races, of the video game World of Warcraft.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s funny cos it&#8217;s true. Especially trashtown. What&#8217;s odd is that there is no entry on a city like austin tx. Surely that place can be ripped to shreds. Yet, there is a rather extensive including no less, separate articles on the races, of the video game World of Warcraft.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cummins</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/09/24/uncyclopedia-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-6636</link> <dc:creator>cummins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:48:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=15172#comment-6636</guid> <description>Man, their Bill Cosby entry is really insane: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Bill_Cosby</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, their Bill Cosby entry is really insane:<br /> <a href="http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Bill_Cosby" rel="nofollow">http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Bill_Cosby</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.021 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.philebrity.com @ 2010-03-21 20:59:10 -->