<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: More Sexy Singles Re-Imaginings: Could These Two Be Making Beautiful Music Together?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.philebrity.com/2008/07/31/more-sexy-singles-re-imaginings-could-these-two-be-making-beautiful-music-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/07/31/more-sexy-singles-re-imaginings-could-these-two-be-making-beautiful-music-together/</link> <description>philly&#039;s longest-standing cityblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: killabee</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/07/31/more-sexy-singles-re-imaginings-could-these-two-be-making-beautiful-music-together/comment-page-1/#comment-6020</link> <dc:creator>killabee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:23:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=14378#comment-6020</guid> <description>what is going on here. really long stories and photoshops? is this philebrity or Something Awful?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is going on here. really long stories and photoshops? is this philebrity or Something Awful?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sluggerB</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/07/31/more-sexy-singles-re-imaginings-could-these-two-be-making-beautiful-music-together/comment-page-1/#comment-6015</link> <dc:creator>sluggerB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:59:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=14378#comment-6015</guid> <description>It pleases me to no end that New York is featured here.  Look out for her new show New York Goes Hollywood or some shit.  There&#039;s sure to be more of ... well, you know.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It pleases me to no end that New York is featured here.  Look out for her new show New York Goes Hollywood or some shit.  There&#8217;s sure to be more of &#8230; well, you know.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sweetjohnny</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/07/31/more-sexy-singles-re-imaginings-could-these-two-be-making-beautiful-music-together/comment-page-1/#comment-6013</link> <dc:creator>sweetjohnny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:46:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=14378#comment-6013</guid> <description>Y&#039;all at Philebrity is crazy today. Is the heat gettin&#039; to you?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;all at Philebrity is crazy today. Is the heat gettin&#8217; to you?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philly Chit Chat</title><link>http://www.philebrity.com/2008/07/31/more-sexy-singles-re-imaginings-could-these-two-be-making-beautiful-music-together/comment-page-1/#comment-6011</link> <dc:creator>Philly Chit Chat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.philebrity.com/?p=14378#comment-6011</guid> <description>I resent you using photos of fake paparazzi. They are an embarrassment to me and my fellow paps, as some of the are using their pop-up flashes, and the others aren&#039;t using a flash bracket.  What kinda mess is that?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I resent you using photos of fake paparazzi. They are an embarrassment to me and my fellow paps, as some of the are using their pop-up flashes, and the others aren&#8217;t using a flash bracket.  What kinda mess is that?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 300/304 objects using apc

Served from: www.philebrity.com @ 2012-02-12 17:55:12 -->
